year 14, Issue 1 (Spring 2024)                   E.E.R. 2024, 14(1): 204-218 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Salehi F, Panahi F, Abbasi H. Estimation of wind erosion threshold velocity using wind tunnel device in dust sources in Khuzestan, Iran (case study: Mahshahr, Omidiyeh, Hendijan). E.E.R. 2024; 14 (1) :204-218
URL: http://magazine.hormozgan.ac.ir/article-1-823-en.html
Faculty of Natural Resources and Earth Sciences, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran. , alabd_fpanahi@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (1090 Views)
1-Introduction
Wind erosion is one of the destructive phenomena that cause environmental changes, changes in the quality of the weather threatens public health, and other economic and social issues in regions with dry and semi-dry climates. Using wind tunnels, the effect of wind velocity and soil properties, as well as the particle transport process, can be investigated under controlled conditions. Ries and Fister estimated the amount of wind erosion in the Ebro basin using a portable wind tunnel in 2009. To evaluate the rate of soil loss, three sample locations were assessed, and the results showed that the areas with unchanged ground surface had the lowest amount of wind erosion. The phenomenon of dust storms in Khuzestan province has had an increasing trend in terms of frequency and continuity in recent years. Considering the issue's importance, the present study was conducted to determine the threshold erosion velocity and erodibility of soils taken from the dust storm centers of Mahshahr, Omidiyeh, and Hendijan, using a wind erosion measurement device.
2- Methodology
The dust centers of Mahshahr-Omidiyeh-Hendijan are located between 30°12'28" to 30°50'57" north latitude and 48°47'45" to 49°41'41" east longitude and have expanded between Mahshahr and Omidiyeh and Hendijan. Using the land unit map, maps from the Geological Survey Organization, and field studies, 32 points were identified in the Mahshahr, Omidiyeh, and Hendijan centers, representing various land units differentiated in the soil map. Finally, ten average points were selected. Samples taken from the soil surface inside the wind tunnel were tested. First wind thereshold velocity, Then the wind erosion rate was measured at speeds of 15, 20, 25, and 30 (m/s) for two minutes, and finally, the wind erosion rate of the sample points was obtained. The median diameter and mean diameter of the particles were determined using Gradistat software to determine the erodibility of the sample particles according to the Chepil theory (Table 2).
3- Results
 the amount of wind erosion increases at wind speeds of 15, 20, 25, and 30 (m/s) over two minutes. Under these conditions, higher wind speeds intensify soil loss and lead to an increase in the rate of wind erosion. The wind erosion threshold varies from 6 to 17 (m/s). The minimum wind threshold velocity is related to the Jarahi-Mahshahr sedimentary plain, which is sensitive to wind erosion at a threshold speed of 6 meters per second and the total amount of wind erosion rate of 12160 (gr/m2.min). The total amount of erosion rate ranged from 360 to 21860 (gr/m2.min) and the highest erosion rate was related to alluviums and alluvial cones in the shape of the Hendijan anticline. the erosion potential of soils taken from dust centers in Khuzestan province is high, and the dominant particle diameter of the soil is 0.5-0.15 (mm) and 0.05-0.1 (mm), which are susceptible to wind erosion. Therefore, all samples collected from dust centers in Khuzestan province are sensitive to wind erosion
4- Discussion & Conclusions
   Locating areas sensitive to wind erosion is one of the important solutions for stabilization. Given the importance of the issue, this study has focused on estimating the erosion potential and threshold velocity in the dust centers of Mahshahr, Omidiyeh, and Hendijan. The results of measuring the erosion rate using a wind tunnel device showed that the soil in these areas has a high erosion potential, and the erosion rate increases significantly with increasing wind speed. The minimum of the wind threshold velocity for sedimentary plains in jarahi-Mahshahr region, located in the northwest center, which indicates the high sensitivity of the soil in the area to wind erosion. The highest amount of wind erosion rate was related to alluvial fans and alluvial cone in the shape of the Hendijan anticlin. The fan-shaped alluviums deposited by the temporary rivers at the foot of the anticline mountains east of Hendijan, because the materials transported by the temporary rivers are mostly fine-grained and marls, so the amount of gravel in these alluviums is low and for this reason, the erosion susceptibility of these soils is very high and they should be stabilized in the early stages. These results are consistent with the results of Abbasi, which led to the preparation of a map of land sensitivity to wind erosion in this center. Studies related to particle size distribution showed the high sensitivity of the samples to wind erosion. Since the dominant diameter of all particles in the samples was in the range of 0.5-0.15 and 0.1-0.05 (mm), the potential for erosion susceptibility of all samples in the study area is high. However, in this theory, only one factor has been used to determine the potential for soil erosion and other effective parameters in erosion susceptibility have not been considered, so it is not possible to rely solely on this theory to estimate erosion.
Full-Text [PDF 758 kb]   (293 Downloads)    

Received: 2023/10/24 | Published: 2024/04/8

References
1. Abbasi H.R. 2021. land sensitivity to wind erosion in Omidiyeh-Hendijan-Mahshahr dust sources, Technical report, Research institute of forests and Rangelands Iran, p.105.
2. Abbasi H.R, Gohardost,. A, Khaksarian., F and Baranizadeh.,M.R, 2021, Determining the sensitivity of land to wind erosion using field data in Hamon Baringak, Sistan, Natural Environment Hazards, 11(33), 121-134.
3. Ahmadi H. Applied Geomorphology Book. Tehran: Tehran University Publication; 1995; 613 p.455-456.
4. Amin, P. and Azimzadeh, H. R. 2015. The effect of desert pavement on soil wind erodibility and wind erosion threshold velocity Case Study: Ebrahimabad basin of Mehriz (Yazd). Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 4(2): 90-104.
5. Ayazi, Z., Mesbahzadeh, I., Ahmadi, H. and Mashhadi, N. 2016. Investigation of sedimentometric power in geomorphological facies using wind tunnel and Orifar model (Case study: Aran Kashan), Journal of Desert Management, No. 8, pp. 70-83
6. Azimzadeh, H., Ekhsati, M. 2004. Wind erosion investigating the effect of physical and chemical properties of soil on Threshold velocity of wind erosion (case study: Yazd-Ardakan Plain). Natural Resources Journal, Volume 57, Number 2, pp.
7. Chepil, W.S. 1945. Dynamics o wind erosion: III. The transport capacity of the wind . soil sci., 60:475-480. [DOI:10.1097/00010694-194512000-00006]
8. Ebrahimian, S. Nahtani, M. Mohammadi, S. Rifatpour, S. 2013. Investigating the damage caused by fine dust on agriculture and environment. Third National Conference on Wind Erosion and Dust Storms. Yazd University, 8 p.
9. Ebrahimi Drche, K., Jannat Rostami, M. Jalali, M. Jafarian, A. 2010. Estimation of wind erosion using IRIFR.E.A method, National Conference on Watershed Management Science and Engineering, Department of Watershed Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, pp. 1-8
10. Fathizad, H., Tazeh, M. and Kalantari, S. 2016. Assessment of pixel-based classification (Artmap Fuzzy Neural Networks and Decision Tree) and object-oriented methods for land use mapping (Case Study: Meymeh, Ilam Province). Arid Biome, 5: 69-81.
11. Fister, W. and Ries, J. B. 2009. Wind erosion in the central Ebro Basin under changing land use management. Field experiments with a portable wind tunnel, Journal of Arid Environments, V73. pp 996-1004. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2009.05.006]
12. Ghaemi,A. 2015. Introduction and capabilities and limitations evaluation of aeolian Eight Directional Sand Trap (EDST) (In Persian).
13. Khosravi, F., Tazeh, M., Saremi naeini, Ma. and Kalantari, S. 2020. Evaluation and comparison of Image J and GIAS softwares with mechanical sieving in automatic particle-size distributions. Arid Biome, 9(2): 29-42.
14. Lal, R., and Stewart, B.A. 1990. Soil degradation: a global threat. Advances in Soil Science.11: 12-16. [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4612-3322-0]
15. Leys, J.F., and Raupach, M.R. 1991. Soil flux measurements using a portable wind erosion tunnel. Austr. J. Soil Res. 29: 4. 533-552. [DOI:10.1071/SR9910533]
16. MohammadKhan, S. and Kashfi, F. s. 2014. The directions of wind-blown sand transport in Ardestan region through the temporal comparison of sand dune morphometry and wind characteristics, Quantitative Geomorphology Researches, year, number 4, 1 pp. 74.
17. Mahmoodabadi, M. Dehghani, F. and Azimzadeh, H.R. 2011. Effect of soil particle size distribution on wind erosion rate. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 1(1): 81-98. (in Persian).
18. Mohammadnia, M. AmirAhmadi, A. , Zangane Asadi, M.A. 2022.Sensitivity of geomorphological facies using wind tunnel Case study: Gonabad TownShip, Journal of Physical Geography Research Vol.54, No.1.
19. Mahmoudabadi, M. Dehghani, F. Azimzadeh, H. 2018. A study of the effect of soil particle size distribution on the intensity of wind erosion. Soil management and sustainable production, periodical, 1 issue, 1 pp.
20. Noorzadeh Haddad, M. and Landi, A. 2018. Mineralogy study and sensitivity of fine dust production sources to gravel cover in the soil surface, a case study of western lands of Khuzestan province, Ahar Geographical Space Quarterly, Vol. 18, No. 64, pp. 61-74.
21. Saad al-Din, A. Akhzari, D. and Nora, N. 2010. Predicting the Effects of Vegetation Management Scenarios on Wind Erosion Risk (Case Study South of Varamin Plain), Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Research, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 63-80.
22. Webb, N. P., Van Zee, J. W., Karl, J. W., Herrick, J. E., Courtright, E. M., Billings, B. J., & Hand, J. L. 2017. Enhancing wind erosion monitoring and assessment for US rangelands. Rangelands, 39(3-4), 85-96. [DOI:10.1016/j.rala.2017.04.001]
23. Webb, N. P., Galloza, M. S., Zobeck, T. M. and Herrick, J. E. 2016. Threshold wind velocity dynamics as a driver of aeolian sediment mass flux, Aeolian Research. V20. pp. 45-58. [DOI:10.1016/j.aeolia.2015.11.006]
24. Zamani, S. and Mahmoodabadi, M., 2013. Effect of particle-size distribution on wind erosion rate and soil erodibility. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 59(12): 1743-1753. [DOI:10.1080/03650340.2012.748984]
25. Zhang, G., Li, L., Tang, W., Liu, L., Shi,P., Han, X. and Da, J. 2023. Wind erosion from crusted playa surfaces by no saltation and with saltation: A comparison through laboratory wind tunnel experiments, International Soil and Water Conservation Research, Vol 11, P, 518-527. [DOI:10.1016/j.iswcr.2022.10.007]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Environmental Erosion Research Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb