In Press (Winter)                   Back to the articles list | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Department of Geomorphology, Faculty of Planning and Environmental Sciences, University of Tabriz and Iranian Hazardology Association, Tabriz, Iran , rezmogh@tabrizu.ac.ir
Abstract:   (531 Views)

Introduction
Flooding is a natural phenomenon that human societies have accepted as an unavoidable event. However, the occurrence, magnitude, and frequency of floods are influenced by multiple factors that vary depending on the climatic, natural, and geographical conditions of each region. Consequently, the relationship between rainfall and runoff differs significantly from one watershed to another. The study area is located in the northwestern part of Iran, within East Azerbaijan Province. The Sarand watershed is a sub-basin of the Aji Chai River, situated in the northeast of Tabriz. The watershed's outlet is positioned to the west of Khajeh County, while its northern boundary extends toward the city of Varzeqan. Additionally, the Heris County is located to the southeast of this watershed. This research aims to identify and map areas susceptible to flash floods in the Sarand chai watershed. By employing the Modified Flash Flood Potential Index (MFFPI) model and analyzing physiographic parameters, a flood potential map has been developed, and the role of key contributing factors to flood occurrence has been assessed. The findings of this study can be utilized for optimizing water resource management, minimizing flood-related damages, and supporting regional development planning.

2- Research Methodology
For the purpose of this study, the parameters of slope, flow accumulation, soil texture, curvature, land use, and land permeability were selected. Subsequently, the weight of each parameter was applied to its five sub-parameters, and the final score for each layer was calculated within the GIS environment. In the first stage, the integration of the six weighted layers resulted in the generation of a flash flood potential map. In the next step, approximately 200 random points were selected from the watershed using the "Create Random Points" tool in ArcGIS. The values for these points were extracted from all six layers as well as from the flash flood potential map within the GIS environment. The normality of the data was assessed using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test in SPSS software. Subsequently, correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to determine the strength of the relationship between dependent and independent variables. In the final stage, based on the results of the statistical analyses, the most influential parameters were identified, and the final flash flood potential map was generated using the significant parameters. In total, 380 points (including flooded and non-flooded areas) were extracted and organized in ArcGIS. Seventy percent of the data was used for model training and the remaining 30 percent for validation. The model’s performance was evaluated using Accuracy, Sensitivity, and Specificity indices.
3- Results
In the first stage of model implementation, the parameters of slope, slope curvature, drainage density, lithology, soil texture, and land use were used. In the second stage, based on the results from the multiple regression analysis, layers with minimal influence were removed. The layers of slope, lithology, and soil texture, which had the greatest impact, were then used to produce the final flash flood map. According to the final map, 36% of the Sarand chai watershed area lies in the very high and high flood risk zones. Based on the spatial distribution of risk zones, areas with very high and high risk are primarily located in riverbeds and low-gradient sedimentary plains perpendicular to the river's axis. In contrast, areas with medium risk are more common in upper terraces, while low and very low-risk areas are mostly found in mountainous and hilly elevations. This pattern highlights the significant role of slope, elevation, and geomorphological characteristics in determining the potential for flash floods in the region.
4- Discussion & Conclusions
The flash flood susceptibility map for the Sarand Chai watershed was generated using physiographic parameters and the Modified Flash Flood Potential Index (MFFPI) model within the ArcMap software environment. The map was classified into five susceptibility zones: very low, low, moderate, high, and very high. To examine the relationships between the variables, Spearman’s correlation coefficient test and multiple linear regression analysis were performed using SPSS software. In this analysis, the physiographic parameters were considered as independent variables, while the flash flood susceptibility layer was treated as the dependent variable. The results of the correlation analysis revealed that slope, lithology, and soil texture had the greatest influence on flash flood occurrence, whereas flow accumulation and curvature had the least impact in this watershed. In the final stage, the three most influential parameters—slope, lithology, and soil texture—were identified and selected. A new flash flood susceptibility map was then produced by applying the respective weights to these layers. The results of the susceptibility zoning map analysis showed that areas with very high, high, moderate, low, and very low flood risk accounted for 19.3%, 16.5%, 25.4%, 24.3%, and 14.3% of the total watershed area, respectively. The assessment of the MFFPI model’s accuracy and performance demonstrated that the model performed well in generating the flood hazard susceptibility map, with coefficients of 87.59% and 88.59% for the training and validation datasets, respectively.
 

Full-Text [PDF 3398 kb]   (25 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2025/04/3

References
1. Get persistent links for your reference list or bibliography. Copy and paste the list, we’ll match with our metadata and return the links. Members may also deposit reference lists here too. 1. Abedini, M., & Beheshti Javid, E. (2016). Flood Risk Zoning in the Liqvan Chai Basin Using Network Analysis Process and Geographic Information System. Geographical Space Quarterly, 16(55), 293-312. (in persian)
2. Abedini, M., & Fathi Jokdan, R. (2016). Flood Risk Zoning in the Korganrud Basin Using ArcGIS. Hydrogeomorphology, 3(7), 1-17. (in persian)
3. Alizadeh, A. (2011). Principles of Applied Hydrology. Ferdowsi University of Mashhad Press. (in persian).
4. Azadi, Fahimeh, Sadouq, Seyed Hassan, Ghahrudi, Manijeh and Shahabi, Heiman. (2019). Zoning of flood risk sensitivity in the Kashkan River watershed using two WOE and EBF models. Geography and Environmental Hazards, 9(1), 45-60. doi: 10.22067/geo. v9i1.83090
5. Bayati Khatibi, Maryam and Karami, Fariba. (2019). Determining the contribution of sudden protrusions in the rate of gully erosion on sloping surfaces: a case study: Ojan Chay sub-basin. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 8(2), 38-51.
6. Cao, C., Xu, P., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Zheng, L., & Niu, C. (2016). Flash flood hazard susceptibility mapping using frequency ratio and statistical index methods in coalmine subsidence areas. Sustainability, 8(9), 948.‏ [DOI:10.3390/su8090948]
7. Ceru, J. (2012). Flash Flood Potential Index (FFPI) for Pennsylvania. Proceedings. In 2012 ESRI Federal GIS Conference.‏ [DOI:10.1515/geo-2018-0047]
8. Chadee, D. D., Sutherland, J. M., & Agard, J. B. (Eds.). (2014). Flooding and Climate Change: Sectorial Impacts and Adaptation Strategies for the Caribbean Region. Nova Publishers. ‏
9. Faramarzi, H., Hosseini, S. M., Pourghasemi, H. R., & Farnaghi, M. (2019). Evaluation and Zoning of Flood Risk in Golestan National Park. Ecohydrology Journal, 6(4), 1055-1068. (in persian) doi: 10.22059/ije.2019.285430.1163
10. Farhan, Y., Anaba, O., Salim, A., (2017). Morphometric Analysis and flash floods assessment for drainage basins of the Ras En Naqb Area, South Jordan using GIS, Applied Morphometry and Watershed Management Using RS, GIS and Multivariate Statistics (Case Studies), 413 p. [DOI:10.4236/gep.2016.46002]
11. Fathalizadeh, B., Abedini, M., & Rajabi, M. (2020). Investigating the causes and hazards of flood in Zunuzchay watershed using HEC-HMS hydrological model and fuzzy logic. Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 9(1), 134-155. (in persian).doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2020.109539
12. Fisher, P., Wood, J., & Cheng, T. (2004). Where is Helvellyn? Fuzziness of multi‐scale landscape morphometry. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(1), 106-128. ‏ [DOI:10.1111/j.0020-2754.2004.00117.x]
13. Ghanavati, E., Karam, A., & Aghaalikhani, M. (2012). Evaluation and Zoning of Flood Risk in the Farahzad Basin (Tehran) Using the Fuzzy Model. Journal of Geography and Environmental Planning, 23(4), 121-138. (in persian)
14. Gomez, H., Kavzoglu, T., 2005. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility using artificial neural networks in Jabonosa River Basin. Venezuela. Eng. Geol. 78 (1-2), 11-27. [DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2004.10.004]
15. Guhathakurta, P., Sreejith, O. P., & Menon, P. A. (2011). Impact of climate change on extreme rainfall events and flood risk in India. Journal of earth system science, 120, 359-373. doi:10.1007/s12040-011-0082-5 [DOI:10.1007/s12040-011-0082-5]
16. Hejazi, A., Negahban, S., Mousavi, M., & Aminzadeh, M. (2024). Assessment and mapping of urban watershed flood by using fuzzy VIKOR and weighted linear combine models (Case study: Catchment Izeh-Khuzestan). Quantitative Geomorphological Research, 13(2), 51-70. (in persian) doi: 10.22034/gmpj.2024.452640.1499
17. Jahangir, M. H., Reineh, S. M. M., & Abolghasemi, M. (2019). Spatial predication of flood zonation mapping in Kan River Basin, Iran, using artificial neural network algorithm. Weather and Climate Extremes, 25, 100215.‏ doi:10.1016/j.wace.2019.100215 [DOI:10.1016/j.wace.2019.100215]
18. Jemai, S., Belkendil, A., Kallel, A., & Ayadi, I. (2024). Assessment of flood risk using Hierarchical Analysis Process method and Remote Sensing systems through arid catchment in southeastern Tunisia. Journal of Arid Environments, 222, 105150. [DOI:10.1016/j.jaridenv.2024.105150]
19. Kale, R.V., Jose, P.G., Taloor, A.K., Kumar, R., 2022. Assessment of digital elevation models based on the drainage morphometric parameters for the Tawi River Basin. In: Advanced Modelling and Innovations in Water Resources Engineering. Springer, Singapore, pp. 119-140. doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4629-4_10 [DOI:10.1007/978-981-16-4629-4_10]
20. Kruzdlo, R., & Ceru, J. (2010, June). Flash flood potential index for WFO Mount Holly/Philadelphia. In Eastern region flash flood conference, poster session, NOAA's National Weather Service (pp. 2-4). ‏
21. Mahmoudzadeh, H., Yari, F., & Vahedi, A. (2017). Application of Remote Sensing and GIS Techniques for Flood Risk Zoning in Urmia City Using a Multi-Criteria Analysis Approach. Physical Geography Research, 49(3), 719-730. (in persian) doi: 10.22059/jphgr.2018.210916.1006894
22. Mirchouli, Fahimeh, Gholami, Isa and Borughni, Mehdi. (1402). Zoning of flood susceptibility in the Famnat watershed, Gilan province. Water and Soil, 37(6), 841-853. doi: 10.22067/jsw.2023.84146.1328
23. Nosrati, A. (2000). Zoning of Flood Susceptibility in the Gaveh Rud Basin Using Remote Sensing and GIS. Applied Research in Geographical Sciences, 3-4, 49-58. (in persian)
24. Osei, B. K., Ahenkorah, I., Ewusi, A., & Fiadonu, E. B. (2021). Assessment of flood prone zones in the Tarkwa mining area of Ghana using a GIS-based approach. Environmental Challenges, 3, 100028. ‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.envc.2021.100028]
25. Parvin, M. (2019). Assessment and Zoning of Flash Flood Risks based on MFFPI Model (Case Study: Islamabad Basin). Environmental Management Hazards, 6(2), 169-184. (in persian) doi: 10.22059/jhsci.2019.283544.480
26. Pike, R. J. (2000). Geomorphometry-diversity in quantitative surface analysis. Progress in physical geography, 24(1), 1-20. ‏ [DOI:10.1191/030913300674449511]
27. Popa, M. C., Simion, A. G., Peptenatu, D., Dima, C., Draghici, C. C., Florescu, M. S., ... & Diaconu, D. C. (2020). Spatial assessment of flash‐flood vulnerability in the Moldova river catchment (N Romania) using the FFPI. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 13(4), e12624. ‏ [DOI:10.1111/jfr3.12624]
28. Rajabi, A. M., Rajaee, T., & Fallah Tafti, A. (2018). Flood zoning of Chalus basin using hydrologic model of HEC-RAS and Geographic Information System. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Iranian Association of Engineering Geology, 11(2), 45-60. (in persian)
29. Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H., & Behboudi, A. (2018). Flood Zoning in the Sarand Chai Basin Using GIS. National Conference on Natural Hazards in Iran: Prediction and Early Warning Methods, December 22, 2018. (in persian)
30. Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H., Mokhtari, D., & Shafiei Mehr, M. (2021). Flood hazard zoning in the Shahr Chai watershed of Mianeh using the VIKOR model. Hydrogeomorphology, 8(28), 19-37. (in persian) doi: 10.22034/hyd.2021.40169.1536
31. Rezaei Moghaddam, M. H., Rajabi, M., Rahimpour, T., & Farazian, A. (2025). Flooding Assessment of Qaleh Chai Basin Using MABAC Multi Criteria Decision Making Method. Environmental Management Hazards, 11(4), 323-337. (in Persian). doi: 10.22059/jhsci.2025.387824.861
32. Samela, C., Albano, R., Sole, A., & Manfreda, S. (2018). A GIS tool for cost-effective delineation of flood-prone areas. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 70, 43-52. ‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2018.01.013]
33. Saraaf, I. P., Mohagheghzadeh, G., & Mohagheghzadeh, N. (2017). Flood Zoning of the Shapur Khast River Using Aerial Images. Geographical Space Quarterly, 17(57), 175-194. (in persian)
34. Shabanlou, S., Sedghi, H., Saghafian, B., & Mousavi, S. H. (2008). Flood zoning in Golestan's rivers network using GIS. Iranian Water Researches Journal, 2(2), 11-22. (in persian)
35. Smith, G. (2003). Flash flood potential: Determining the hydrologic response of FFMP basins to heavy rain by analyzing their physiographic characteristics. Salt Lake City: NWS Colorado Basin River Forecast Center. ‏
36. Taha, M. M., Elbarbary, S. M., Naguib, D. M., & El-Shamy, I. Z. (2017). Flash flood hazard zonation based on basin morphometry using remote sensing and GIS techniques: A case study of Wadi Qena basin, Eastern Desert, Egypt. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 8, 157-167. ‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.rsase.2017.08.007]
37. Taloor, A. K., Sharma, S., Sharma, D., Chib, R., Jasrotia, R., Gupta, S., ... & Kale, R. V. (2024). Estimation of MFFPI for flood hazards assessment using geospatial technology in the Tawi Basin, India. Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 3(1), 100233. ‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.geogeo.2023.100233]
38. Tian, J., Xiao, T., & Zeng, S. (2025). Intelligent identification of flood risks and resilience planning in piedmont areas with nature-based solutions. Ecological Indicators, 172, 113274. ‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113274]
39. Tincu, R., Lazar, G., & Lazar, I. (2018). Modified flash flood potential index in order to estimate areas with predisposition to water accumulation. Open Geosciences, 10(1), 593-606. ‏ [DOI:10.1515/geo-2018-0047]
40. Toda, L. L., Yokingco, J. C. E., Paringit, E. C., & Lasco, R. D. A LiDAR-based flood modeling approach for mapping rice cultivation areas in Apalit, Pampanga. Applied Geography, 2017; 80: 34-47. [DOI:10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.12.020]
41. Valizadeh, K. K., Delire, H. R., & Azari, A. K. (2019). Flood zoning and its impact on land use in the surrounding area using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) images and GIS. (in persian)
42. http://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.26767082.1398.10.3.4.5
43. Vasu, N. N., Lee, S. R., Pradhan, A. M. S., Kim, Y. T., Kang, S. H., & Lee, D. H. (2016). A new approach to temporal modelling for landslide hazard assessment using an extreme rainfall induced-landslide index. Engineering Geology, 215, 36-49. ‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.enggeo.2016.10.006]
44. Wang, L., Cui, Sh., Tang, J., Fang, L., Fang, X., Shewstha, S., Manandhar, B., Huang, J., Nitivattananon, V. (2023). Riverine Flood Risk Assessment with A Combined Model Chain in Southestern China, Ecological Indicators, 154, pp 1-11. [DOI:10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110686]
45. Waleed, M., & Sajjad, M. (2025). High-resolution flood susceptibility mapping and exposure assessment in Pakistan: An integrated artificial intelligence, machine learning and geospatial framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 121(10544), 2. ‏ [DOI:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2025.105442]
46. Wood, J. (2023). Scale-based characterisation of digital elevation models. In Innovations in GIS (pp. 163-175). CRC Press. ‏ [DOI:10.1201/9781003417156-19]
47. Yao, J., Zhang, X., Luo, W., Liu, C., & Ren, L. (2022). Applications of Stacking/Blending ensemble learning approaches for evaluating flash flood susceptibility. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 112, 102932 [DOI:10.1016/j.jag.2022.102932]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Environmental Erosion Research Journal

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb